
PREFACE
When we began
this book we intended simply to gather together the stories and images
of goddesses as they were expressed in different cultures, from the
first sculpted figures of the Palaeolithic era in 20,000 BC down to
contemporary pictures of the Virgin Mary. This seemed worth doing because
one way in which humans apprehend their own being is by making it visible
in the images of their goddesses and gods. But in the course of this
research we discovered such surprising similarities and parallels in
the goddess myths of apparently unrelated cultures that we concluded
that there had been a continuous transmission of images throughout history.
This continuity is so striking that we feel entitled to talk of 'the
myth of the goddess', since the underlying vision expressed in all the
variety of goddess images is constant: the vision of life as a living
unity.
----The Mother Goddess, wherever she is
found, is an image that inspires and focuses a perception of the universe
as an organic, sacred and indivisible whole, in which humanity, the
Earth and all life on Earth participate as 'her children'. Everything
is woven together in one cosmic web, where all orders of manifest and
unmanifest life are related, because all share in the sanctity of the
original source.
----- However, it was evident that in our
present secular age the goddess myth is nowhere to be found. Of course,
in the Catholic version of Christianity, Mary, 'the Virgin', 'Queen
of Heaven', is clothed in all the old goddess images - except that,
significantly, she is not 'Queen of Earth'. The Earth used to have,
as it were, a goddess to call her own, because the Earth and all creation
were of the same substance as the Goddess. Earth was her epiphany: the
divine was immanent as creation. Our mythic image of Earth has lost
this dimension.
----- So we set out to discover what had
happened to the image of the goddess, how and when it disappeared, and
what were the implications of this loss. Since mythic images implicitly
govern a culture, what did this tell us about a particular culture -
such as our own - that either did not have or did not acknowledge a
mythic image of the feminine principle? It began to seem no coincidence
that ours is the age above all others that has desacralized Nature:
generally speaking, the Earth is no longer instinctively experienced
as a living being as in earlier times, or so it would seem from the
evidence of pollution (itself a term that originally meant the profaning
of what was sacred). And now is also the time when the whole body of
the Earth is threatened in a way unique to the history of the planet.
----- Consequently, the second aim of this
book became to explore the way in which the goddess myth was lost; when,
where and how the images of 'the god' arose, and how goddess and god
related to each other in earlier cultures and times. It soon became
clear that, from Babylonian mythology onwards (c. 2000 BC), the Goddess
became almost exclusively associated with 'Nature' as the chaotic force
to be mastered, and the God took the role of conquering or ordering
'Nature' from his counterpole of 'Spirit'. Yet this opposition had not
previously existed, so it needed to be placed in the context of the
evolution of consciousness. One way of understanding this process is
to view it as the progressive withdrawal of participation from nature,
which makes possible an increasing autonomy and independence of natural
phenomena and a gradual transference of 'nature's life' into humanity.
This is how it seems to be that humanity and nature become polarized.
But while this polarization can be seen to be a first stage in this
process - perhaps even an inevitable one - it does not constitute an
absolute description of the two terms that were once one. Yet so much
are we still living with the thought structures initiated in the late
Bronze and early Iron Ages that we were obliged continually to remind
ourselves that this was not intrinsic to the way in which we had to
reflect upon these terms.
----- It came, then, as a surprise to discover
the extent to which our Judaeo-Christian religion or mythology (depending
on the point of view) had inherited the paradigm images of Babylonian
mythology, particularly the opposition between Creative Spirit and Chaotic
Nature, and also the habit of thinking in oppositions generally. We
find this, for instance, in the common assumption that the spiritual
and the physical worlds are different in kind, an assumption that, unreflectively
held, separates mind from matter, soul from body, thinking from feeling,
intellect from intuition and reason from instinct. When, in addition,
the 'spiritual' pole, of these dualisms is valued as 'higher' than the
'physical' pole, then the two terms fall into an opposition that is
almost impossible to reunite without dissolving both of the terms.
----- We concluded that, for the last 4,000
years, the feminine principle, which manifests mythologically as 'the
goddess', culturally as the value placed upon relationship with the
Earth and the Cosmos, and psychologically as the priority given to spontaneity,
feeling, instinct and intuition, had been lost as a valid expression
of the sanctity and unity of life. In Judaeo-Christian mythology there
is now, formally, no feminine dimension of the divine, since our particular
culture is structured in the image of a masculine god who is beyond
creation, ordering it from without; he is not within creation, as were
the mother goddesses before him. This results, inevitably, in an imbalance
of the masculine and feminine principles, which has fundamental implications
for how we create our world and live in it.
----- We also found that even when the
goddess myth was debased and devalued, it did not go away, but continued
to exist in disguise - in images that were prevented from expressing
themselves vitally and spontaneously. In Greek mythology, for example,
Zeus 'married' the old mother goddesses, one after the other, and they
continued to rule the provinces of childbirth, fertility or spiritual
transformation in their own right, even though they were finally answerable
to the father god himself. In Hebrew mythology the goddess went, so
to speak, underground. She was hidden in the chaotic dragons of Leviathan
and Behemoth, whose destruction was never complete, or in the ineluctable
appeal of the forbidden Canaanite goddess Astarte, or, more abstractly,
in the feminine personification of Yahweh's 'wisdom' - Sophia - and
his 'presence' - the Shekhinah. Eve, though human and cursed, was given
by Adam the displaced name of the mother goddesses of old - 'the Mother
of All Living'- though with fatally new and limited meaning. The Virgin
Mary, as the 'Second Eve' - who has been gathering importance over the
centuries in answer, it must be, to some unfulfilled need of many people
- was finally declared 'Assumed into Heaven, Body and Soul' as Queen
only in the 1950s.
----- In all these instances, as we hope
to show, the myth of the goddess continued to act on the prevailing
world view of the time. However, since this myth was contrary to formal
doctrine, its action had to be implicit and indirect in the manner of
any less-than-fully conscious attitude, which meant that its unacknowledged
but persistent presence often distorted even the finest expressions
of the prevailing myth of the god. It seemed clear that the feminine
principle was an aspect of human consciousness that could not and should
not be eradicated. Consequently, it needed to be brought back into consciousness
and restored to full complementarity with the masculine principle if
we were to achieve a harmonious balance between these two essential
ways of experiencing life.
----- So where may we discover the goddess
myth now? Turning then to the discoveries of the 'new' sciences, it
appeared, astonishingly, as if the old goddess myth were re-emerging
in a new form, not as a personalized image of a female deity, but as
what that image represented: a vision of life as a sacred whole in which
all life participated in mutual relationship, and where all participants
were dynamically 'alive'. For, beginning with Heisenberg and Einstein,
physicists were claiming that in subatomic physics the universe could
be understood only as a unity, that this unity was expressed in patterns
of relationship, and that the observer was necessarily included in the
act of observation. Characteristically, these conclusions were themselves
expressed in many of the images that belonged to the old goddess myth.
The web of space and time that the mother goddess once spun from her
eternal womb - from Neolithic goddess figures buried with spindle whorls,
through the Greek spinners of destiny, down to Mary - had become the
'cosmic web' in which all life was related. All the mother goddesses
were born from the sea - from the Sumerian Nammu, the Egyptian Isis,
the Greek Aphrodite, down to the Christian Mary (whose name in Latin
means sea). Now this image has come back into the imagination as the
'sea of energy' of the 'Implicate Order'. (1) James Lovelock's 'Gaia Hypothesis' takes its name from the ancient Greek
Mother Goddess Earth.
----- From a mythological perspective,
the goddess myth can also be seen in the attempts of many human beings
to live in a new way, allowing their feeling of participation with the
Earth as a whole to affect how they think about it and act towards it,
aware of the urgent need to comprehend the world as a unity. Einstein
is the spokesman for this need: 'The unleashing of the power of the
atom bomb has changed everything except our mode of thinking, and thus
we head toward unparalleled catastrophes.' (2)
----- But the predominant mythic image
of the age - which could be characterized as 'the god without the goddess'
- continues to support the very oppositional and mechanistic paradigm
that the latest scientific discoveries are refuting. This means that
two essential aspects of the human mind are out of accord with each
other. It may seem a lot to claim that mythic images are so important
to all areas of human experience, but the discoveries of Depth Psychology
have shown how radically we are influenced and motivated by impulses
below the threshold of consciousness, both in our personal and in our
collective life as members of the human race. We cannot, then, afford
to be indifferent to the prevailing climate of thought. It would seem
necessary to make the attempt to move beyond our mythological inheritance
in the same way that we try to gain some perspective on our individual
inheritance - our specific family, tribe and country.
----- One way of bringing the myth of the
goddess back into consciousness is to tell again the stories people
have told down the millennia, and to follow the continuous chain of
images through different cultures from 20,000 BC onwards, gathering
them all together so that their underlying unity can appear. Then this
neglected, devalued but apparently unquenchable tradition may speak
for itself. This we have tried to do, in the hope that the vision of
life as a sacred whole, which at its finest the goddess myth embodies,
might be brought into relation with the god myth, and so contribute
to the new mode of thinking for which Einstein calls.
-----Owen Barfield, in his wonderfully
concise book Saving the Appearances, (3) defines three phases in the evolution of human consciousness: the first
as the phase of Original Participation; the second as the phase of Separation
and the third as the phase of Final Participation which he describes
as "a self conscious rapport with the whole phenomenal world."
We realised as we worked
together on our book, that the first phase was reflected in the image
of the Mother Goddess; the second in the image of the Father God; and
the third in the image of the Sacred Marriage of Goddess and God: the
recovery of the original experience of participation in a sacred universe
through an imaginative and consciously created empathic relationship
with all orders of life.
-----
We took a decision to focus on the Western tradition and so we have
not attempted to tell the stories of India, Africa and the Far East.
This is obviously a limitation, but the book is long enough already!
Perhaps readers will see parallels and points of contrast that would
contribute to a truly universal theme.
----- One word about myth. Myth,
as the foremost exponent of mythology, Joseph Campbell, has written,
is a dream everyone has, just as everyone also dreams her or his own
personal myths: 'dream is the personalized myth, myth the depersonalized
dream':
Throughout the inhabited world, in all times and under
every circumstance, the myths of man have flourished; and they have
been the living inspiration of whatever else may have appeared out of
the activities of the human body and mind. It would not be too much
to say that myth is the secret opening through which the inexhaustible
energies of the cosmos pour into human cultural manifestation. Religions,
philosophies, arts, the social forms of primitive and historic man,
prime discoveries in science and technology, the very dreams that blister
sleep, boil up from the basic, magic ring of myth. (4)
Myths are the stories of the human race that we dream onwards.
In fact, the most we can do, according to Jung, is 'to dream the dream
onwards and give it a modern dress'. (5) Back
in the Bronze Age a union of the mythic images of the feminine and the
masculine principles was symbolized in the 'sacred marriage' of the
goddess and the god, a ritual ceremony that was believed to assist the
regeneration of nature. With the greater self-consciousness of 4,000
years later, may it not be possible to re-create in the human imagination
the same kind of insights that once were enacted in unconscious participation
with the same purpose: the renewal of creative life? What would the
modern dress of this ancient dream be? With the restoration of the feminine
to a complementary relation with the masculine, might there then be
the possibility of a new mythology of the cosmos as one harmonious living
whole? Nature and Spirit, after the many millennia of their separation,
newly embraced as one and the same?
1. David Bohm, Wholeness and the Implicate Order,
Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1980, p. 192.
2. Albert Einstein, The Expanded Quotable Einstein, collected
and edited by Alice Calaprice, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and
Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 2000, p. 184.
3. Owen Barfield, Saving the Appearances, Second Edition, published
1988 by the Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, Conn. USA.
4. Joseph Campbell, The Hero with a Thousand Faces, p. 269
5. C.G. Jung, Collected Works, Vol. 9:1, p. 269
------
---- -
______________________________________________________________________________________
REVIEWS
 
The Myth of the Goddess: Evolution
of an Image
"This
is a long book, but it is not a page too long. It is of great significance
for the reappraisal - which is grossly overdue - of our approach to
history. Here is a work of immense pioneering significance."
-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""
-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""---------""-----"" Sir
Laurens van der Post
"One
of the most important contributions to the evolving state of our culture
since the Second World War. A beautiful, luminous, feelingly written
study of the goddess image through time."
Lindsay
Clarke
"How rare - and
how lovely - to find a book that does it all: justice to the great poetic
stories; good scholarship that is not ideological; a sharp psychological
intelligence; and a style that is a pleasure to read. I shall recommend
this book again and again for years and years"
-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""
-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----"" James
Hillman
"The Myth of the Goddess brings together the best of modern scholarship in lucid synthesis; it
is a definitive work of great importance"
-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""
-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""Rupert
Sheldrake
"The
authors of this ground-breaking, rich, ambitious work attempt to trace
the evolution of consciousness by following humanity's changing attitudes
toward female deities …. A wonderfully readable synthesis, this monumental
study is packed with scores of riveting illustrations. It will serve
as a source book for students of myth, feminists and those seeking to
balance and integrate masculine and feminine components of their psyche."
-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""Publishers
Weekly May 1992
"... a stunning achievement,
the sweeping story of the intellectual, social and cultural history
of humanity. This extraordinary book provides the mirror in which we
can see more clearly who we are and how we arrived here."
-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""
-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-Natural
Science Book Club
'This generous and ambitious study
- is packed with knowledge from a heaped board of sources, and presents
a historical chronology for the "evolution" of the subtitle. But like
the cross-dressed heroine of a chivalric romance, it really records,
not the story of the past, but a quest for the buried Grail of the feminine,
which will heal the self-inflicted wounds humanity continues to open
and re-open."
-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""Marina Warner,
author 'Alone of all Her Sex'
"This is the ultimate that has
been written on the myth of the Goddess so far, a powerful and most
complete synthesis of what we know about the goddess between the Upper
Palaeolithic and modern times. The book is a clear and masterful presentation
in fifteen chapters of the flourishing Goddess religion in Upper Palaeolithic
and Neolithic times; its demise during the Bronze Age caused by the
infiltration's of patriarchal Indo-Europeans and Semitic peoples in
the Near East and Europe; a cruel and total dethronement during the
Iron Age; and ultimately, the irresistible rise of the goddess as Sophia
and Virgin Mary as an indestructible archetype needed for the fullness
of life in an unbalanced patriarchal society. Each chapter is an indispensable
part of the whole and yet each can be read as a separate book.
-----This Magnum Opus will serve
as a sourcebook and a guide for many coming years. It will be an indispensable
source work for historians of religion, philosophers, anthropologists,
archaeologists, and everyone else interested in this very important
development of religious ideas.
-----The learned and unbiased presentation
of the problem will help to overcome the fear of the Goddess. Most of
all this book will serve as a torch for the future, directing us to
an understanding of female and male, goddess and god, not in terms of
opposition, but as complementarity."
-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""---"" --"" Marija
Gimbutas Professor of Archaeology UCLA
"Two
Jungian analysts' amazingly detailed research has produced an encyclopaedic
volume of goddess information. Artifacts are painstakingly documented
as the authors trace the fascinating history of goddess worship from
the Palaeolithic mother goddess through the great father god of the
Iron Age to Eve, Mary, and Sophia. Baring and Cashford describe the
metamorphosis of the original creator goddess into a male god image
during the Christian Era, from Wisdom/Sophia/Hockhmah, to the incorporation
of the archetypal feminine image associated with Christ as Logos, the
Word of God, and finally to the Holy Spirit of the Trinity. The authors
explain that these fluctuations in deity illustrate the "soul's constant
attempt to restore relationship and balance between the feminine and
masculine archetypes reflected in the images of goddess and god. Excellent
and complete index and bibliography. A valuable scholarly reference
for anyone's library as well as fascinating reading."
-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----"Evelyn
Byers Suries, SBC BOOKNEWS
"This brilliant and
penetrating study will surely be recognised as a landmark in its field…Here
we have the evolution of consciousness presented through mythic images,
which are generously illustrated in the text. The authors are both Jungian
analysts with experience between them in the fields of art, history,
literature, mythology and philosophy. Their work can be seen as an extension
of Jung's own psycho-historical approach and that of his follower Erich
Neumann, author of the classic books "The Origins and History of Consciousness"
and "The Great Mother." It assumes immense topical importance because
it addresses perhaps the central psychological task of our time, namely
the reconciliation or marriage of the masculine and feminine principles…
-----In their final chapter, the authors
summarise their perspective and call for a restructuring of consciousness
so as to permit the sacred marriage, the reconciliation of masculine
and feminine, transcendence and immanence, spirit and nature. The key
insight is no longer to think in terms of 'opposites that tend to conflict,
but as complements that tend to relate'; to advance from dualism and
opposition to duality and complementarity. They draw on Owen Barfield's
useful distinction between the 'original participation' of prehistory
and 'final participation', which involves a conscious rediscovery of
the connectedness of humanity and nature. Mentally, this means attributing
much greater significance to image, feeling and intuition and seeing
life as an organic whole; such is the message, quoted on the first and
last pages, of Chief Seattle. From what I have written here, I hope
to have conveyed that this book is a major contribution to our contemporary
self-understanding and the need to achieve an integrated view of life."
-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-----""-- The Scientific and Medical Network Review 1993
----- -
----- -

---
Click on any book cover below to open ---
|