To attempt to give the essence of
a man's soul and his influence on our culture is a great privilege and
a great responsibility. Some of you may not have read Jung's Seven
Sermons to the Dead, so in this talk, to prepare the ground for
the reading of them, I thought I would tell you the story of the events
leading up to them, briefly introduce the Sermons and also show you
some of the paintings that Jung did during this time. They are published
in a book called C.G. Jung, Word and Image, published by Bollingen
in 1979.
---- Every culture needs a vertical axis as well as a horizontal one. That
is to say, we need to aspire to something beyond and greater than ourselves.
Without this vertical axis, we are liable to lose ourselves in the confusing
maze of the "ten thousand things" as the Daoists put it. 350 years ago
God was the supreme value, the vertical axis. Today our culture does
not recognize a dimension of reality beyond the physical universe, nor
any form of consciousness transcendent to our own. It has exiled soul
and rejected spirit. With them it has banished beauty, wonder and awe.
Great poets and visionaries and artists who in other times connected
us to soul and spirit hold no place of honour in our culture. This makes
it difficult for people to understand Jung, for Jung, like Dante and
Blake, was a visionary. What is a visionary? A visionary is someone
who is open to a universe beyond the literal mind, someone who has direct
experience of dimensions or worlds we are not normally aware of. Jung's
greatest longing was to build a bridge between the reality we see and
know with our physical senses and another unseen reality. He knew that
our greatest need is for connection with the transcendent, not through
belief alone, but through deeper experience of the invisible world that
underlies the physical one.
----- Jung's great contribution to our understanding of ourselves is that
he discovered that the soul was accessible – like physical reality
– to scientific exploration. Beyond the conscious mind lay a vast unexplored
hinterland that he called the collective unconscious. He knew that the
modern psyche was in a state of suffering and alienation because the
conscious mind knew nothing of this deeper ground, and therefore could
not grow to its full potential, its full stature through relationship
with it. He defined sickness or neurosis as a state of incompleteness,
and health as a state of wholeness brought about through the reconnection
of our conscious mind with that unrecognised dimension of reality. A
few years before he died he said to a friend that he felt his foremost
task was to open people's eyes to the fact that man has a soul, and
that there is a buried treasure in the field and that our religion and
philosophy are in a lamentable state". (1)
----- One
of the great themes of ancient myth is the hero's journey into the underworld,
his encounter there with a fearsome adversary and his return to the
world of everyday life, bringing with him a priceless treasure. With
this treasure, he is able to regenerate his culture, heal the sick,
free the people from the spell cast on them by demonic powers, release
the waters of life so that fertility is restored to the wasteland. This
theme has its root in the sun and the moon's nightly and monthly journey
into darkness and their return to illumine our world: a timeless theme
of life, death and regeneration and the essential relationship of the
light and the dark, the known and the unknown. It descends to us from
Egypt, Mesopotamia and Greece. It underlies all later mythologies, including
the Christian and the Gnostic ones, which taught that we have become
separated from our home in the divine world and are therefore exiled,
lost or asleep. It tells of the need to enter the unexplored depths
of ourselves in order to recover our connection with that world, thereby
bringing about our awakening, transformation and return to the source.
This is the mythological theme which underlies the Seven Sermons
to the Dead.
-----In the
prologue to his autobiography – Memories, Dreams, Reflections – Jung says: "In the end the only events in my life worth telling are
those when the imperishable world irrupted into this transitory one.
That is why I speak chiefly of inner experiences, among which I include
my dreams and visions. These form the prima materia of my scientific
work. They were the fiery magma out of which the stone that had to be
worked was crystallised". (2)
So what were these inner experiences
and how did Jung come to write the Seven Sermons to the Dead?
Jung parted from Freud in 1912 when he was 37. During the next seven
years from 1913–19 when he was trying to develop his own orientation
to the treatment of his patients, he deliberately provoked a near-overwhelming
eruption of visions, dreams and fantasies. He called this period his
Nekyia — a Greek word which describes a descent into the underworld.
It is important to note that this experience took place just before
and during the First World War whose catastrophic effects he had foreseen
in a series of visions during the autumn and spring of 1913-14:
In October, while I was alone on a journey, I was suddenly seized
by an overpowering vision: I saw a monstrous flood covering all the
northern and low-lying lands between the North Sea and the Alps. When
it came up to Switzerland I saw that the mountains grew higher and higher
to protect our country. I realised that a frightful catastrophe was
in progress. I saw the mighty yellow waves, the floating rubble of civilisation,
and the drowned bodies of uncounted thousands. Then the whole sea turned
to blood. This vision lasted about one hour... Two weeks passed; then
the vision recurred, under the same conditions, even more vividly than
before, and the blood was more emphasised. An inner voice spoke: 'Look
at it well; it is wholly real and it will be so. You cannot doubt it'. (3)
-----These
visions were followed by a dream, thrice repeated, in the spring of
1914:
In the middle of summer an Arctic cold wave descended and froze the
land to ice. I saw, for example, the whole of Lorraine and its canals
frozen and the entire region totally deserted by human beings. All living
green things were killed by frost. In the third dream frightful cold
had again descended from out of the cosmos. This dream, however, had
an unexpected end. There stood a leaf-bearing tree, but without fruit,
whose leaves had been transformed by the effects of the frost into sweet
grapes full of healing juices. I plucked the grapes and gave them to
a large waiting crowd'. (3)
-----The
idea of war did not occur to him at all, he says, and so he drew the
conclusion that he must be threatened by a psychosis. But as events
culminated in the outbreak of war in August 1914, he began to understand
the meaning of these visions and dreams and to take the unconscious
seriously as an unexplored dimension of reality in which all humanity
participates.
----- The
visionary has to translate the images and words of an unseen, archetypal
world into the language and understanding of his time. His conscious
mind, struggling to contain the overwhelming power and numinosity of
the experience, will interpret it according to the level of his own
understanding and the needs of the age in which he or she lives. Jung
had to undergo the original experience in order to find the knowledge
that was missing in the science of his day and then to discover how
to communicate that knowledge in a way that people could understand.
He took great care to try and understand every single image, every item
of his psychic inventory, and to classify them scientifically – so far
as this was possible – and tried to embody his insights in his daily
life, for he knew that this was an ethical obligation of the conscious
mind towards the unconscious. (4)
-----Some
have seen the experience of these years as a psychotic episode and have
labeled Jung schizophrenic; others, including myself, see it as a shamanic
initiation into the direct experience of another order of reality. There
are two dangers attendant on this experience - one is the danger of
insanity - of being overwhelmed by the material - not having a sufficiently
strong conscious ego to contain it. The other is the danger of becoming
identified with the material, inflated by it, taking it to be absolute,
literal truth. Jung had the greatest difficulty in maintaining his psychic
and emotional balance during this time.
----- Fortunately
Jung had the help of a superb education in addition to his medical and
psychiatric training. This education included knowledge of Greek and
Latin and a thorough grounding in philosophy, literature and history.
He had a brilliant innovative and intuitive mind as well as the intellectual
knowledge and psychiatric experience to ground his discoveries in empirical
observation. These seven years after his break with Freud in 1912 were
tumultuous and extremely stressful for himself and his family. He took
care to allow plenty of time for solitude, reflection, writing down and painting his dreams and fantasies,
often brooding by the lake close to his home and building villages out
of the stones on the beach.
----- "At
this time when I was working on the fantasies," he writes, "I needed
a point of support in 'this world'. It was most essential for me to
have a normal life in the real world as a counterpoise to that strange
inner world. My family and my profession remained the base to which
I could always return, assuring me that I was an actually existing,
ordinary person."(5)
----- Jung
recorded his experience in over 1000 handwritten pages and illustrations,
many of which he later bound together in a still unpublished volume
that he called The Red Book. The Red Book opens with a beautiful page
written in fourteenth century German script. In the top left hand corner,
there is a landscape painted inside a large initial in the manner
of medieval illuminated manuscripts.
----- This
picture he painted is of Philémon, the being who was his guide to the
underworld of the unconscious, rather as Virgil was guide to Dante.
Jung writes of him: "He said things which I had not consciously thought.
At times he seemed to me to be quite real, as if he were a living personality.
Philémon and other figures of my fantasies brought home to me the crucial
insight that there are things in the psyche which I do not produce,
but which produce themselves and have their own life. Philémon represented
a force which was not myself."(6) Philémon taught
Jung psychic objectivity: that the psyche was as real as the physical
world. He represented superior insight and acted like an inner Guru
or guide to the unconscious.
----- Through
these beautifully worked pages, we can see how the dimension of the
soul is rescued from neglect and obscurity; its life is given meaningful
form in images and words. In this way it becomes accessible to the conscious
mind.
----- Jung
found it ironical that he, a psychiatrist, should encounter at almost
every step of his experiment the same psychic material which is typical
of psychosis. "This," he says, "is the fund of unconscious images which
fatally confuse the mental patient. But it is also the matrix of a mythopoeic
imagination which has vanished from our rational age." (7)
----- Then,
one day in the summer of 1916, as he describes it in his autobiography,
certain paranormal experiences occurred, among them dreams and disturbances
told him by his children and the repeated ringing of the doorbell when
no-one was there: "The house was filled as if it was crammed full of
spirits" he writes, "and the air was so thick it was scarcely possible
to breathe." "For God's sake," he said to them, "What in the world is
this?" And the spirits cried out in chorus: "We have come back from
Jerusalem where we found not what we sought." (8)
And that is how the Sermons begin. Jung wrote down what he heard
that evening and on the two subsequent ones.
----- It is
not an exaggeration to say that the material which came to him during
these seven years and, in particular, during those three evenings, was
the "fount and origin" of all his future work. "It has taken me," he
wrote near the end of his life, "virtually forty-five years to distil
within the vessel of my scientific work the things I experienced and
wrote down at that time... The years when
I was pursuing my inner images were the most important in my life —
in them everything essential was decided. It all began then; the later
details are only supplements and clarifications of the material that
burst forth from the unconscious, and at first swamped me. It was the prima materia for a lifetime's work". (9)
----- Jung's
courage and tenacity in risking insanity to experience this unexplored
dimension of consciousness sums up his lifelong determination to devote
himself, as he put it, to the scientific exploration of the soul — to
listen to its voice, decipher its language and its imagery, become receptive
to its attempts to communicate with the conscious mind. Like many titans
of innovative thought who are ahead of their time, he has been reviled,
contemptuously dismissed as a mystic, and to a large extent, ignored,
notably by members of his own psychiatric profession. But Jung revived, extended
and deepened the concept of soul for the whole culture, rescuing it
from the obscurity and neglect into which it had fallen for centuries.
In his writings and his practice, soul becomes not something that belongs
to us but something to which we belong — a vast and unexplored
dimension of reality. He asked again the great soul questions: what
is life? What is God? What is the root of evil? What is the purpose
of our lives on this planet and how can we fulfil it?
----- Because
the Sermons are so deeply rooted in the Gnostic tradition,
it is necessary to say a little about this. There was a great stream
of human experience which flowed from the thriving city of Alexandria
in Egypt into several channels — into the writings of the early Christian
Gnostics, the Hermetic Tradition, the later Alchemists, and the transmitters,
both Jewish and Christian, of the ancient tradition of Kabbalah. Hellenistic
Egypt in the second and third centuries ce. was the immediate source
of all these traditions, yet the roots lie deeper, in the temple teachings
of a far older Egypt. Alexandria was the city of Gnostic teaching; the meeting place of East and West, a vibrant crucible for the exchange
of ideas and teachings between Egyptians, Greeks, Syrians and Jews,
and also sages from the East bringing teachings from far-away Persia
and India. This vital stream of esoteric teaching which was later to
suffer such persecution at the hands of the Christian Church, is the
"complementary" or missing counterpart of the orthodox tradition that
is familiar to us. It is an essential yet largely unknown aspect of
our spiritual inheritance.
----- It is
also helpful to know about shamanic traditions lost to Western civilization:
traditions which speak of unorthodox methods of healing; visionary experience;
travelling to other dimensions of being; encountering and speaking to
the Ancestors and the souls of the "dead". All this material belongs to the history of the
evolution of consciousness. It too, endured remorseless persecution
by the Christian Church. It is astonishing that so much survived, passed
from individual to individual, century to century.
----- So who
were the Gnostics? They were a group of early Christians, among them
the descendents of Jews who had fled Jerusalem after the murder of James,
the brother of Jesus, who claimed to have inherited the secret teaching
that Jesus imparted to his closest disciples, including his brother.
Many Gospels now lost were in circulation among them, including the
four that have come down to us. There are two Greek words for knowledge.
One of them, epistémi, means knowledge in the sense of information
gathered. The other, gnosis, means knowledge in the sense
of insight and wisdom. The meaning and purpose of life is to be discovered
neither through faith nor through accumulating knowledge about the known
world, but through inward transformation and growing insight into the
nature of reality. The Gnostic Gospels show that their deepest concern
was with how to open the eye of the heart, how to awaken us to awareness
of the divine ground of our nature, to awaken us from a state, not of
sin, but of sleep and ignorance.
----- Prior
to 1945 and the discovery of the 52 Gnostic texts buried at Nag Hammadi
in Egypt, there were few texts that survived destruction when the Gnostic
sects were repressed and their books burnt by order of the Emperors Constantine
and Theodosius in the fourth century ce. By 1912 Jung was already familiar with
these and with the work of the German scholars who had studied them.
This enabled him to grasp the significance of the images, fantasies
and dreams that presented themselves to him during these seven years
and, in particular, the material of the Sermons. He would have
known that he was writing in the Gnostic tradition of listening to the
voice of the soul and that what he was experiencing was similar to what
the Gnostics and Kabbalists had recorded of their own visionary and
auditory experiences. But, and this is crucially important, he also
knew that he had to grow into the meaning of what he had heard. As a
psychiatrist, he had to interpret this raw material and embody it in
a form that people could understand, that could become the basis of
a new understanding of the soul.
----- The
Sermons speak with the voice of a prominent Gnostic teacher –
a man called Basilides – one of the two great Gnostic teachers who taught
in Alexandria in the second century ce and who was himself taught
by a man who was a follower of the Apostle Peter. He is said to have
written 24 books of commentaries on the many Christian Gospels then
existing. He was also a poet and his teachings were carried as far as
Spain by his disciples. So now we come to the First Sermon which bears
a strong similarity to the few fragments of Basilides's work which have
survived.
----- The
opening words of the First Sermon read: "The dead came back from Jerusalem
where they found not what they sought. They prayed me to let them in
and besought my words, and thus I began my teaching." How can we understand
these words? Who are the dead? In the Gnostic teaching the dead are
those who take the material world to be the only reality and who have
no awareness of the existence of other dimensions. The dead come to
Alexandria to seek out the Gnostic tradition, the conventional Christian
tradition (represented by Jerusalem) having apparently failed them.
With these Sermons, Jung opens the door to psychic contents and
psychic needs which have been neglected and repressed for centuries
and which he, as a potential carrier of consciousness for the whole
culture, needed to become aware of. He writes that these conversations
with the dead "formed a kind of prelude to what I had to communicate
to the world about the unconscious: a kind of pattern of order and interpretation
of its general contents."(10) No wonder he was
filled with excitement as he began to decipher their strange language
and imagery and to realise the implications of what they were saying.
The text of the Sermons is full of paradoxes, and is complex, powerful and difficult
to understand. It might be helpful when listening to them to imagine
three interpenetrating and interacting worlds or dimensions: first,
the familiar material world; secondly, an intermediate world of immeasurable
extent – the unseen yet ever-present archetypal world of the soul – and
thirdly, a world that Basilides calls the Pleroma, a Gnostic
term for the divine ground of being which is the root of all, present
within all yet beyond and transcendent to all.
----- In the
First Sermon Basilides describes the Pleroma as a boundless,
indefinable and totally transcendent dimension of being which nevertheless
permeates the created world in the way that sunlight permeates air.
We ourselves in our essential being are the Pleroma, because
we and the whole created world partake of the nature of the eternal
and the infinite. The Pleroma is the beginning and the end of
created beings. Yet as the created world comes into being and we experience
ourselves as separate from the Pleroma, it is rent in two. Our
human task, that Basilides calls the Principle of Individuation, is
to respond to the innate prompting of our nature to grow into our full
potential as differentiated individuals in this world yet at the same time to live
with the deepest awareness of our oneness with the divine ground of
the Pleroma. He ends the first Sermon saying that we should strive
after our true nature because it is this that will bring us to our goal.
But how do we discover our true nature?
----- In the
Second Sermon the dead ask to know about God. "Where is God? they ask.
Is God dead?" And Basilides answers that God is not dead but that all
things which are brought forth from the Pleroma are pairs of
opposites: the life force manifests as both creation and destruction,
as good and evil, as God and Devil, and these are inextricably
mingled in the created world and in ourselves. God and Devil are fullness
and emptiness, generation and destruction. Activity is common to both.
Basilides names the principle of activity as the highest god or power
who is beyond this primal pair of opposites and gives this god the name
Abraxas (a gnostic term). If the Pleroma were capable of having
a being, Abraxas would be its manifestation, he says.
-----In the
Third Sermon, the dead ask to be taught further about this highest god.
Basilides says that Abraxas is undefinable life itself, the mother of
both good and evil. Abraxas is the pulse of existence, cosmic energy
in all its mystery, power, beauty and terror, its perpetual coming into
being and its perpetual dissolution. Abraxas can be imagined as a dynamic
energy that brings into being all worlds, the life force pulsing into
all that we know and are in this manifest dimension of reality. Abraxas
is the titanic force of the life process residing in the atomic nucleus
of the soul. On the level of life on this planet, Abraxas is embodied
in the immense power of instinct which is really the age-old life patterns
of the planet and all the life connected with it. Until we become aware
of this power within us and discover how consciously to relate to it,
we are likely to be driven by blind unconscious instinct and to act
in ways that may be divine or demonic without being able properly to
distinguish between them. Abraxas connects us to the life of the earth,
yet also to the life of the cosmos, the life that flows to us from the
divine ground of the Pleroma. It is both the unknown radiance
and the dark shadow of our own psychic life.
----- Of the
shadow Jung wrote: "One does not become enlightened by imagining figures
of light, but by making the darkness conscious. The latter procedure
is disagreeable and therefore not popular."(11)
In the Fourth Sermon, the dead rather grumpily ask to be told about
gods and devils. Basilides speaks to them about the multiplicity of
good and evil forces, among them the Burning One whom he names Eros
and the Growing One whom he names the Tree of Life. Each contains both
good and evil. The emptiness of the whole is the Pleroma
and the activity, the life of the whole is Abraxas. This vast diversity
of light and dark elements cannot be compressed into the concept of
a single God because this leads to the mutilation of the created world
and the mutilation of man who is part of this vast diversity. To compress
diversity into oneness leads to the mutilation of life, to uniformity,
sameness and the fear of differentiation. It is useless to worship the
gods or even the one God but it is essential to know the nature and
power of the cosmic forces.
----- In the
Fifth Sermon the dead sardonically ask to be taught about church and
holy community. In this Sermon and the next Basilides speaks of the
Heavenly Mother and the Earthly Father, about spirituality and sexuality,
the tension between them and the hidden contra-sexual polarities in
man and woman. He also teaches them that spirituality and sexuality
are not qualities that human beings can possess or comprehend. Rather,
they are mighty daemons – archetypal principles – whose energies flow
through us and to whose laws we are subject. We are rooted in instinctual
life yet we are drawn back to our source in the divine world of the
Pleroma. Both polarities have to be recognised, honoured and
integrated within our own nature. Otherwise we may fall victim to the
one or the other, blindly driven through life by them. Finally he says
that man needs a balance between community and solitude, between belonging
to and differentiating himself from the group. Again, a balance must
be held between these polarities. Too great an identification with the
group brings dismemberment and dissolution in collective beliefs and
behaviour. Too great isolation from it brings the risk of the same. Community, he
says, gives us warmth, while solitude gives us the light.
----- In the
Sixth Sermon Basilides speaks of the power of sexuality to delude those
who know of no other world beside the material one, and the power of
effective thought which comes to those who seek solitude and which connects
us with what is beyond us and with those already awakened souls who
try to reach us, to help us. The Mother, he says, intercedes and warns
but she has no power against the gods. The dead contemptuously say:
"Cease to speak to us about gods, demons and souls. We have known all
of this in essence for a long time!"
----- In the
Seventh Sermon the dead return again to Basilides for they have forgotten
to ask about man. Basilides teaches them that man is the unique link
between the macrocosm and the microcosm, the portal between the outermost
infinity and the innermost infinity. In immeasurable distance, he says,
there glimmers a solitary star on the highest point of heaven. This
star is man's God and goal, his world, his Pleroma, his divinity.
In it man finds repose. There is nothing that can separate man from
this God provided he can turn away from his fascination with the fiery
power of Abraxas. To this One man ought to pray. Such a prayer increases
the light of the star. Such a prayer builds a bridge over death. It
increases the light of the microcosm; when the outer world grows cold,
this star still shines.
----- Jung
knew through his own experience that the imagination was the key to
relationship with the archetypal ground of the soul. It falls to us
to create a relationship with it, developing insight and wisdom through
listening, observation and dialogue with it. Ignorance of the tremendous
power of the hidden energies which lie beyond the limited and fragile
conscious mind, risks our being taken over by them, falling into madness
and the dissolution of our humanity - something that we increasingly
see happening today.
----- When
Nietzsche proclaimed the death of God at the end of the nineteenth century,
he was describing not the literal death of God but the decay of a belief
system and an image of spirit that was worn out, because it was
no longer numinous and therefore relevant to millions of people. Jung
realized that that the problems of our time are rooted not only in the
grip that scientific materialism has on a secular culture, but above
all in the loss of a living myth and the increasing polarisation between
the conscious mind and the unconscious, between thinking and feeling,
mind and soul. He saw that the dissociation of the conscious rational
mind from what he called the primordial or instinctual soul presented
a growing and unperceived danger to humanity. The more we emphasized
reason and the supremacy of the rational mind, the more instinct would
drive, possess, delude and overwhelm us.
-----Jung
knew that conventional religious teaching had not preserved the vital
knowledge that nature and instinct are an expression of spirit. In splitting
nature from spirit, emptying matter of soul, and contaminating the instincts
with guilt and fear, an essential part of our wholeness has been lost.
He knew it was vitally important to balance the predominantly masculine
character of our culture with its emphasis on power, control and conquest
by integrating the less valued aspects of the feminine archetype: nature
and matter, soul and body, feeling and instinct: that is, to create
a conscious, healing and redemptive relationship with these neglected
aspects of spirit within ourselves and within the culture. What he offered
was not a new belief system but a spirituality grounded in self-knowledge, particularly awareness of the shadow, leading to ethical responsibility
towards life in all its aspects, seen and unseen. He knew that we did
not have much time in which to accomplish this momentous task.
In answer to the question
"What can I do?" Jung said, "Become what you have always been, namely,
the wholeness we have lost in the midst of our civilised, conscious
existence, a wholeness that we always were without knowing it." (12)
Notes
1. From
a letter written by Jung in 1960 quoted by Dr. Gerhard Adler in Dynamics
of the Self,
Coventure, London 1979, p. 92
2. Prologue to Memories Dreams, Reflections
p. 18
3. Memories Dreams, Reflections p. 169-70
4. Memories Dreams,
Reflections p. 184
5. Memories Dreams,
Reflections p. 181
6. Memories Dreams,
Reflections p. 176
7. Memories Dreams,
Reflections p. 181
8. Memories Dreams,
Reflections p. 183
9. Memories Dreams,
Reflections p. 191
10.Memories Dreams, Reflections p. 184
11. CW 13, par. 335
12. CW 10, par. 722
I am deeply indepted in this lecture to Stephen A. Hoeller, and his
book The Gnostic Jung and the Seven Sermons to the Dead, Quest
Books, 1982 and 1994 and to C.G. Jung: Word and Image, Bollingen
1979